RBOT EVIDENCE LAB
公开 AI 交易测评

交易报告分析:MonDip long · MT5 UK100 H1 Backtest

The MonDip long UK100 H1 backtest shows a modest +7.30% return with a 7.77% maximum drawdown and PF 1.44 over 35 trades, but small-sample and profit-concentration concerns limit confidence.

分析时间:2026-10-12 22:06

本页分析用户提交的 MT4/MT5 报告,不认证账户归属、不重跑独立回测,也不预测未来收益。

0–100 AI 评分是基于证据的评审判断,不是盈利概率;应结合评分依据与未知事项阅读。

阅读指标公式、报告类型对比与证据边界
回测

MonDip long · MT5 UK100 H1 Backtest

0–100 AI 评分是基于证据的评审判断,不是盈利概率;应结合评分依据与未知事项阅读。

60/100策略安全评分
7.3%收益
7.77%最大回撤
1.44PF
35交易数

数据透明度

本页分析用户提交的 MT4/MT5 报告,不认证账户归属、不重跑独立回测,也不预测未来收益。

数据来源用户上传的 MT5 报告
经纪商ForexTimeFXTM-Demo02
品种UK100
周期H1
交易区间2025-01-09 — 2026-10-01
报告类型回测
报告交易数35
处理方式解析器提取与支持的核算 + AI 风险解读;非账户认证

核心指标

下列指标来自导入记录与支持的核算,比较前应核对资金基数、费用、出入金和交易期间。

收益7.3%
最大回撤7.77%
PF1.44
胜率62.86%
净利润730.11
单笔期望20.86
平均盈亏比0.85

增长

以导入报告的起始资金归一化为 100。该图按已保存的逐笔结果采样,不等同于经纪商实时权益曲线。

以导入报告的起始资金归一化为 100。该图按已保存的逐笔结果采样,不等同于经纪商实时权益曲线。

详细计算结果

下列指标来自导入记录与支持的核算,比较前应核对资金基数、费用、出入金和交易期间。

10,000.00初始资金
730.11净利润
62.86%胜率
2,398.44总盈利
1,668.33总亏损(绝对值)
109.02平均盈利单
-128.33平均亏损单
0.85平均盈亏比
20.86单笔期望
419.51最大盈利单
-255.45最大亏损单
9最长连胜
3最长连亏
1.00平均手数
630.0 天样本跨度
0.06日均交易

收益率 = 净利润 ÷ 初始资金 × 100%;PF = 总盈利 ÷ 总亏损绝对值;单笔期望 = 净利润 ÷ 已平仓交易数;平均盈亏比 = 平均盈利单 ÷ 平均亏损单绝对值;最大回撤采用报告输出的最大回撤值。若报告含入金或出金,收益率应结合现金流另行解释。

策略安全评分依据

Verified positive: 35 parsed closed rows, net profit 730.11 on 10,000 capital (+7.30%), profit factor 1.44, win rate 62.86%.

  • Verified negative: small sample of 35 closed trades over a 630-day period (2025-01-09 to 2026-10-01).
  • Verified concentration: top 1 trade accounts for 17.49% of gross profit; removing it drops remaining profit factor to 1.19.
  • Verified concentration: top 2 trades account for 30.63% of gross profit; remaining net profit becomes -4.55 with profit factor 1.00.
  • Verified drawdown: max drawdown 7.77%, balance range approximately 9,967 to 11,582 mid-period, within normal bounds for this strategy.
  • Positive: fixed size 1 lot across all rows suggests no compounding, doubling, or martingale-like escalation is evident in the parsed rows.
  • Pending: no commission, swap, or spread cost is present in report_context, so cost sensitivity cannot be assessed from this backtest.

关键风险信号

Small sample: only 35 closed trades across 630 calendar days; statistical confidence in the 62.86% win rate and PF 1.44 is limited.

  • Profit concentration: top 2 trades contribute 30.63% of gross profit; without them, remaining net profit is -4.55 and remaining PF is 1.00.
  • All parsed rows are sell/out, so direction bias or hedging behavior cannot be verified from the normalized close-only rows.

现有数据无法判断

Entry prices, entry timestamps, ticket pairing, and actual trade direction are not present in the close-only parsed rows.

  • Commission, swap, and spread costs are not reported in report_context; net-of-cost performance is unknown.
  • The strategy's entry rule, stop-loss/take-profit levels, and whether any exit was a trailing stop cannot be determined from close-only rows.
  • Whether the 35 trades represent all strategy entries or only a subset of closed events is not specified.

下一步行动

Obtain paired entry/exit ticket data to verify trade direction, entry timing, and whether any exit is a trailing-stop style positive s/l.

  • Rerun the backtest with commission, swap, and realistic spread settings to assess net-of-cost performance.
  • Extend the sample period or combine with additional out-of-sample data to test whether the win rate and profit factor hold beyond 35 trades.
  • Run a forward Demo test on the same symbol and period to compare live execution against the backtest's fixed-size assumptions.
  • Review the top 2 trades to understand whether their outsized contribution reflects a repeatable edge or a one-off event.

常见问题

0–100 AI 评分是基于证据的评审判断,不是盈利概率;应结合评分依据与未知事项阅读。

Q. How much of the reported profit comes from the largest trades?

A. The top 1 trade accounts for 17.49% of gross profit, and the top 2 trades account for 30.63%. Removing the top 2 trades leaves net profit at -4.55 and a remaining profit factor of 1.00, so the overall return is concentrated in a small number of trades.

Q. Is the trailing-stop style of exits visible in this report?

A. All parsed rows are close-only sell/out records with no entry tickets, so exit style cannot be identified. Some stop-loss exits show positive profit, which is typical of a trailing stop or breakeven stop, but the supplied evidence does not confirm the mechanism.

Q. How reliable is the 97% History Quality for this backtest?

A. The report states 97% History Quality with 2,321,739 ticks over 10,239 bars. No explicit tester warnings or error flags are present, so the quality figure indicates substantial but not perfect modelled tick coverage; it does not by itself establish statistical reliability of the 35-trade sample.

Q. Does the report include commission, swap, or spread costs?

A. No commission, swap, or spread cost fields appear in report_context. The +7.30% return and 1.44 profit factor are therefore gross-of-cost figures, and net performance after trading costs cannot be determined from this evidence.

Q. How is RBOT different from asking a general-purpose AI assistant (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude or DeepSeek) to analyse my report myself?

A. RBOT parses MT4/MT5 reports into structured metrics and trade records before AI review. Supported calculations can be checked against the original export; AI wording and scores can vary and are not guaranteed to be deterministic or comparable across reports. General AI assistants may also use calculation tools. Missing actual slippage, ownership or forward validation still requires other evidence.