RBOT EVIDENCE LAB
公开 AI 交易测评

交易报告分析:XAUUSDi_M1_6047 · MT4/MT5 XAUUSDI Real

A single-account XAUUSDI record showing a -94.86% return and 96.14% maximum drawdown across 613 closed trades, with net losses dominated by two extreme single positions; strategy safety is critically low.

分析时间:2026-10-08 09:41

本页分析用户提交的 MT4/MT5 报告,不认证账户归属、不重跑独立回测,也不预测未来收益。

0–100 AI 评分是基于证据的评审判断,不是盈利概率;应结合评分依据与未知事项阅读。

阅读指标公式、报告类型对比与证据边界
真实

XAUUSDi_M1_6047 · MT4/MT5 XAUUSDI Real

0–100 AI 评分是基于证据的评审判断,不是盈利概率;应结合评分依据与未知事项阅读。

5/100策略安全评分
-94.9%收益
96.14%最大回撤
0.45PF
613交易数

数据透明度

本页分析用户提交的 MT4/MT5 报告,不认证账户归属、不重跑独立回测,也不预测未来收益。

数据来源用户上传的 MT4/MT5 报告
品种XAUUSDI
交易区间2026-01-13 — 2026-04-23
报告类型真实
报告交易数613
处理方式解析器提取与支持的核算 + AI 风险解读;非账户认证

核心指标

下列指标来自导入记录与支持的核算,比较前应核对资金基数、费用、出入金和交易期间。

收益-94.9%
最大回撤96.14%
PF0.45
胜率43.56%
净利润-9,485.67
单笔期望-15.47
平均盈亏比0.58

增长

以导入报告的起始资金归一化为 100。该图按已保存的逐笔结果采样,不等同于经纪商实时权益曲线。

以导入报告的起始资金归一化为 100。该图按已保存的逐笔结果采样,不等同于经纪商实时权益曲线。

详细计算结果

下列指标来自导入记录与支持的核算,比较前应核对资金基数、费用、出入金和交易期间。

10,000.00初始资金
-9,485.67净利润
43.56%胜率
7,803.57总盈利
17,289.24总亏损(绝对值)
29.23平均盈利单
-49.97平均亏损单
0.58平均盈亏比
-15.47单笔期望
953.87最大盈利单
-2,960.85最大亏损单
15最长连胜
16最长连亏
0.23平均手数
99.2 天样本跨度
6.18日均交易

收益率 = 净利润 ÷ 初始资金 × 100%;PF = 总盈利 ÷ 总亏损绝对值;单笔期望 = 净利润 ÷ 已平仓交易数;平均盈亏比 = 平均盈利单 ÷ 平均亏损单绝对值;最大回撤采用报告输出的最大回撤值。若报告含入金或出金,收益率应结合现金流另行解释。

策略安全评分依据

Catastrophic loss: return -94.86%, maximum drawdown 96.14%

  • Profit factor is only 0.45: losses far exceed profits
  • Verified: net profit -9,485.67 against a 10,000 capital base, return -94.86%.
  • Verified: maximum drawdown 96.14%, essentially wiping the account equity.
  • Verified: profit factor 0.45 with a 43.56% win rate across 613 closed trades, i.e. losses outweigh profits.
  • Verified: two single closed rows show losses of -2,960.85 (row 610) and -2,909.95 (row 580), each exceeding 29% of starting capital.
  • Verified: profit concentration is extreme - the top 1% of trades (7 rows) carry 42.25% of gross profit, and removing them leaves remaining net profit of -12,783.03 and remaining profit factor 0.26; top 5% (31 rows) carry 66.65% of gross profit and excluding them leaves remaining profit factor 0.15.
  • Verified: the parsed rows include many very short holding times and mixed buy/sell rows clustered within minutes, which is a high-frequency behavioural pattern without confirmed entry-ticket pairing.
  • Pending: no Demo or Real forward-account record is supplied, so live execution behaviour is unverified.

关键风险信号

Catastrophic loss: return -94.86%, maximum drawdown 96.14%

  • Profit factor is only 0.45: losses far exceed profits
  • Capital destruction: -94.86% return and 96.14% maximum drawdown together indicate the account was effectively wiped out.
  • Tail-loss dominance: two rows at -2,960.85 and -2,909.95 each exceed 29% of the 10,000 starting capital, showing unbounded single-position loss potential.
  • Weak edge: profit factor 0.45 and 43.56% win rate mean the strategy needs outsized winners to survive, and it did not.
  • Fragile profit base: excluding the top 1% of trades leaves remaining net profit of -12,783.03 and remaining profit factor 0.26; excluding the top 5% leaves remaining profit factor 0.15.
  • Row-level clustering: many rows indicate near-instantaneous opens/closes and repeated small-lot activity, a profile sensitive to spread and slippage that is not modelled in the available settings.

现有数据无法判断

Entry-ticket pairing is absent in the parsed rows, so whether clustered rows are separate positions, hedges, or a single basket cannot be confirmed.

  • Tick model, modelling quality, spread, slippage, commission and swap are not provided in report_context.
  • The lot-sizing rule that produced sizes ranging from 0.01 to 3.3 is not documented, so whether sizing represents compounding, recovery, or another rule is unknown.
  • Whether the two large losing rows (rows 580 and 610) reflect held positions, widened stops, or forced closure is not stated.

下一步行动

Re-run the strategy with explicit entry-ticket pairing so clustered rows and any multi-position exposure can be identified rather than inferred.

  • Produce and supply a Demo or Real forward record over a comparable period to compare against this backtest's -94.86% return and 96.14% drawdown.
  • Add spread, slippage, commission and swap to the test settings and re-run to measure their effect on the many short-duration rows.
  • Inspect the two largest losing rows (row 580 and row 610) to determine whether they were held positions, stop removals, or forced closures.
  • Recalculate performance excluding the top 1% and top 5% winners to confirm whether any edge survives tail removal.

常见问题

0–100 AI 评分是基于证据的评审判断,不是盈利概率;应结合评分依据与未知事项阅读。

Q. What does the -94.86% return and 96.14% maximum drawdown mean for this account?

A. The account started at 10,000 and produced net profit of -9,485.67, with the maximum drawdown reaching 96.14% of equity. Almost the entire capital base was consumed over the 2026-01-13 to 2026-04-23 period.

Q. How much of the result depended on a few large winners?

A. The top 1% of trades (7 rows) account for 42.25% of gross profit; excluding them, remaining net profit is -12,783.03 and remaining profit factor is 0.26. The top 5% (31 rows) account for 66.65%; excluding those, remaining profit factor is 0.15, so the profit base is highly concentrated.

Q. What do the two largest losing rows show?

A. Rows 610 and 580 show individual closed losses of -2,960.85 and -2,909.95, each exceeding 29% of the 10,000 starting capital, which drove much of the drawdown and shows significant single-position loss potential.

Q. Is this verified as a live or demo account record?

A. No demo marker was found and no Demo or Real forward record is supplied. The account field was not labelled as demo, but because the report_context is empty and no forward test exists, the curve is a single backtest-style record whose live execution characteristics remain unverified.

Q. How is RBOT different from asking a general-purpose AI assistant (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude or DeepSeek) to analyse my report myself?

A. RBOT parses MT4/MT5 reports into structured metrics and trade records before AI review. Supported calculations can be checked against the original export; AI wording and scores can vary and are not guaranteed to be deterministic or comparable across reports. General AI assistants may also use calculation tools. Missing actual slippage, ownership or forward validation still requires other evidence.

RBOT.CC · EA 与量化交易系统平台使用 RBOT 测评工具查看全部公开测评